From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Is there an environment for Org syntax?
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:09:57 +0100
Message-ID: <87ob12jy8a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <CAGk6a7kZgCYYCW53paO4JeYHZreQD-974iMVT5kbNyANbbkXGg@mail.gmail.com>	<1187822931.636304.1394835216554.JavaMail.zimbra@ittc.ku.edu>	<CAGk6a7m=jpXCr9wAj6Y6n7pqvAdHOCbgj5Y+6HqBhyWGraECqQ@mail.gmail.com>	<1681130543.636394.1394838254099.JavaMail.zimbra@ittc.ku.edu>	<CAGk6a7mp=ducuC1ZkEJ8a06ekkTUK8z2vbsfVE82+QnkE+vL7A@mail.gmail.com>	<926970118.636480.1394840068162.JavaMail.zimbra@ittc.ku.edu>	<CAGk6a7kBThGihBdvFP-x5vf2i2=mvT3ZncKs+1OF=tCpWEM-4A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51522)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bounce+7f29f6.16488-emacs-orgmode=gnu.org@kickhub.com>)
	id 1WQDRp-0003Jp-2N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:10:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bounce+7f29f6.16488-emacs-orgmode=gnu.org@kickhub.com>)
	id 1WQDRi-0001KS-F4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:10:09 -0400
Received: from rs249.mailgun.us ([209.61.151.249]:37275)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bounce+7f29f6.16488-emacs-orgmode=gnu.org@kickhub.com>)
	id 1WQDRi-0001H2-8h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:10:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAGk6a7kBThGihBdvFP-x5vf2i2=mvT3ZncKs+1OF=tCpWEM-4A@mail.gmail.com>	(Fletcher
	Charest's message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:58:18 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Fletcher Charest <fletcher.charest@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Phil Regier <pregier@ittc.ku.edu>

Hi Fletcher,

Fletcher Charest <fletcher.charest@gmail.com> writes:

> When I use the edit buffer (by pressing C-c '), my Org syntax is
> indented properly (in accordance with org-indent-mode, which is set
> to t). The code block itself looks like this after editing:
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC org :exports code
>   ,* Top level headline
>   ,** Second level
>   ,*** Third level
>   some text
>   ,*** Third level
>   more text
> #+END_SRC
>
> As you can see, the text ('some text' and 'more text') is not
> indented. This is a little bit annoying, but not too much - I can add
> the spaces myself.

The indentation of the exported HTML looks correct to me:
"some text" is right below "*** Third level"

> The problem is with the HTML export: I can't see the HTML output as I
> would see it in my Emacs buffer, that is to say, without the leading
> stars. In my output (see attached), leading stars are visible,
> although not colored. I would like them to be completely invisible.

The HTML color of the leading stars is taken from the org-hide face.
When your background is black, the org-hide face is black, hence the
color you see in the HTML output.

HTH,

-- 
 Bastien