From: Feng Shu <tumashu@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Better way to specify the latex documentclass of an exported file without changing my configuration?
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:24:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ob0tjorv.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2r45p4apk.fsf@polytechnique.org
Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm collaborating on a paper with some colleagues, and I convinced them
> to use org-mode. I'm trying to make sure the paper is as self-contained
> as possible (I don't want them to have to change their emacs
> configuration file).To change the documentclass name of the exported
Maybe you can write a Makefile to change their emacs configure...
> article, I added the following block in a section that is not exported:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent :exports results
> (add-to-list 'org-latex-classes
> '("llncs"
> "\\documentclass{llncs}"
> ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")
> ("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}")
> ("\\subsubsection{%s}" . "\\subsubsection*{%s}")))
> #+end_src
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> My questions are:
> - is there a way to do this without an emacs-lisp block?
> - is there a nicer way to make sure that an emacs-lisp block is
> evaluated upon export than ":exports results :results silent"? (If
> I don't put it there, the block is not evaluated.)
> - is there a way to just say the name of the documentclass without all
> the boilerplate code below? In other words, can I say "this is a llncs
> documentclass with the same sectioning as an article"?
You should defun a classe for llncs.sty before use it. maybe
you can rename llncs.sty to article.sty, and put it to directory which contain
your org file.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-26 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-26 8:37 Better way to specify the latex documentclass of an exported file without changing my configuration? Alan Schmitt
2014-03-26 9:24 ` Feng Shu [this message]
2014-03-26 12:38 ` Fabrice Niessen
2014-03-26 12:53 ` Alan Schmitt
2014-03-26 18:46 ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-03-26 22:03 ` Alan Schmitt
2014-03-26 12:47 ` Alan Schmitt
2014-03-26 23:26 ` Richard Lawrence
2014-03-26 13:21 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-26 13:54 ` Alan Schmitt
2014-03-26 14:10 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-26 14:57 ` Alan Schmitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ob0tjorv.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org \
--to=tumashu@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).