From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Engster Subject: Re: problem with org-caldav and ox-icalendar: UID property wrapping Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:54:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87oay9n4z2.fsf@engster.org> References: <87vbthd6mw.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <878uqdzj6w.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqdxz5aj.fsf@engster.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wruna-00056m-NS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:55:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrunV-00068o-Cn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:55:06 -0400 Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:54695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrunV-00068E-3v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:55:01 -0400 Received: from dslc-082-083-039-000.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.39.0] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrunT-0003KN-C9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:54:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wqdxz5aj.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Wed, 07 May 2014 22:45:40 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org David Engster writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> Eric S Fraga writes: >>> I have tracked this down to org-icalendar outputing wrapped lines even >>> for UID entries: >>> >>> ,---- >>> | BEGIN:VEVENT >>> | DTSTAMP:20140507T114443Z >>> | UID:0400[...]00 >>> | 00[...]6 >>> | DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20120403T060000 >>> `---- >> >> AFAIU RFC 5545, all lines longer than 75 octets, including UID lines, >> are expected to be folded. Therefore I think ox-icalendar is right. > > Yes, it is. > > I've already rewritten that part in org-caldav, but it needs more > testing. I'll push a fix in the coming days. Well, that took a bit longer, but I pushed it now... -David