From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Groth Subject: Keeping metadata/notes about files and directories Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:36:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87oau68nnc.fsf@grothesque.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XWQGq-0004kj-I6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:36:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XWQGh-0002Mr-9n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:36:44 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XWQGh-0002M4-3t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:36:35 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XWQGU-0004DS-TF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:36:22 +0200 Received: from dra38-5-82-246-248-175.fbx.proxad.net ([82.246.248.175]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:36:22 +0200 Received: from christoph by dra38-5-82-246-248-175.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:36:22 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dear all, I just wrote under the subject “Re: Managing articles in org mode and collaboration”. This posting puts the other one in a broader context. While thinking about organizing articles, I asked myself: Wouldn’t it be useful to keep metadata/notes about *various* kinds of files/sub-directories/projects inside org-mode (or something similar)? One example is a collection of programming projects. Just like for articles, it would be useful to add notes and metadata to each project. The same is true for many other archive-like collections of things that grow over time. The same problems appear as described in the other posting (namely scaling and searching). I know that there have been discussions about this in the past, and I know that there’s org-annotate-file. Is there anyone who uses a scheme like this (for >1000 items, say) in practice? Christoph