From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: Exporting to multiple files Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:07:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87oatv51ek.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> References: <20140309023409.15f5bd11@aga-netbook> <87mw9ghdtk.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87oatwtr0i.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87vbo47ydf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZKZC-00020W-6P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:07:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZKZ6-0002te-5o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:07:42 -0400 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:38953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZKZ5-0002rt-VT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:07:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2664050763 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:07:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VIjAZMr1dEqP for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:07:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [150.254.74.241]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED4C350761 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:07:33 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <87vbo47ydf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2014-10-01, at 14:44, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I thought about using Org publishing mechanism instead of exporting, >> but the two systems seem pretty locked in their paradigms: publishing >> is many-to-many, exporting is one-to-one (or many-to-one, with >> includes). There's no built-in option for one-to-many. > > Publishing can give you one-to-many since :publishing-function accepts > a lists of functions. Is it a bad idea to write an /export/ backend with one-to-many functionality? (Epub is probably the most obvious use case, but there are others.) > Regards, Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University