From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: org-time-stamp adds "repeater" where there is none.
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:56:26 +0100
Message-ID: <87oaoxtts5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87zj8hol5b.fsf@yahoo.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41778)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YMNGl-0006Z9-3W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:55:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YMNGg-0000hH-Rf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:55:23 -0500
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:49527)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YMNGg-0000gw-MY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:55:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87zj8hol5b.fsf@yahoo.fr> (Nicolas Richard's message of "Fri, 13
	Feb 2015 17:01:52 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Richard <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Nicolas Richard <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr> writes:

> Consider the following line:
>
> <2015-02-13 ven.> (10h-13h)
>
> Hiting C-c . RET with point on the timestamp gives
> <2015-02-13 ven. -13h> (10h-13h)
>
> which is not expected.

It should now be fixed.

> Please consider the patch below

Thank you for the patch. However, I applied something different.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou