From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: Why not push? Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 18:42:56 +0800 Message-ID: <87oaov3173.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87h9unwk0r.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87d25bo3wj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33331) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwfO-0007B4-Rm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:43:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwfJ-0006fz-U5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:43:10 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwfJ-0006fr-NP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:43:05 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwfH-0000tx-G9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:43:03 +0100 Received: from 123.123.19.30 ([123.123.19.30]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:43:03 +0100 Received: from eric by 123.123.19.30 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:43:03 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the >> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following >> construction: >> >> (setq list (cons (something) list)) >> >> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there? > > No. Good luck with refactoring "org.el". ;) Shhh... if you don't say anything, he might go and do it!