From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: Marking/highlighting text temporarily Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 22:56:14 +0800 Message-ID: <87oam76l0x.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87a8xyrn39.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87bnieufde.fsf@mbork.pl> <87zj5xewsp.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87iockmyxy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bnicshhc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r3r57zre.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lhhb2uot.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87oam7p6a7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw1r865s.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87383j6pnd.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnTT8-0002f7-Ub for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:00:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnTT4-0004gd-Rq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:00:10 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnTT4-0004eM-M9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:00:06 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YnTT2-0004Ko-QJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:00:05 +0200 Received: from 114.248.23.63 ([114.248.23.63]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:00:04 +0200 Received: from eric by 114.248.23.63 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:00:04 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric S Fraga writes: > On Wednesday, 29 Apr 2015 at 20:34, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > > [...] > >> Yup, "annotation mechanism" is about right. Just to be clear, you think >> it fits into the category of incubation-prior-to-core? > > [...] > >> Now I wish we'd named it org-annotate. > > Is it too late? Simple refactoring of the code? > > I find org-annotate more expressive of its purpose and doesn't conflict > with e.g. org-toggle-comment... No, it's definitely not too late. Depending on the outcome of this whole conversation, I'd like to rename it.