From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: C-c ' buffer recenters point after every save
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:32:20 +0200
Message-ID: <87oal7c9ej.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAJcAo8uaiM2a462+nVuyKXxEOf5LnPmNXFCdjT9XcMtNaVdzvA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41298)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YxMR7-0006fF-VZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:30:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YxMR4-0000Do-55
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:30:57 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:45980)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YxMR4-0000Cl-05
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:30:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJcAo8uaiM2a462+nVuyKXxEOf5LnPmNXFCdjT9XcMtNaVdzvA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Samuel Wales's message of "Tue, 26 May 2015 13:55:38 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:

> dunno if it is just me, but every save moves point.  can this be
> disabled?

I think I fixed it earlier. Could you update Org and test again? If the
problem persists, I will need an ECM.

> also (unrelated) this buffer modifies capture to ask you for a label.
> can this be disabled?

I don't understand this one.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou