From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Lundin Subject: Re: Allowing loose ordering in Org files Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:44:43 -0600 Message-ID: <87oaf1lh38.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <871tc83p01.fsf@flynn.nichework.com> <87h9l32gfc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1vq3mh4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mh23iw0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878u6eu5wg.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <315DDEDC-1BD9-4680-A8C8-B36821EB931C@gmail.com> <874mh2u2w0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ziytyl3z.fsf@free.fr> <877flqskci.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4e5vjpw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87si4dlh7d.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59264) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFmd-0001sZ-Ch for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:44:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFmZ-0004Bi-Bl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:44:51 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:35883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwFmZ-0004BH-7q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:44:47 -0500 Received: from archthink (c-50-172-132-15.hsd1.il.comcast.net [50.172.132.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6E00BC016D5 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:44:44 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87si4dlh7d.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Matt Lundin's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:42:14 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Matt Lundin writes: > John Wiegley writes: > >>>>>>> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> >>> I really don't like the idea of making Org /syntax/ customizable, would it >>> be with the help of a hook or a variable. >> >> From what I've seen so far, several users want regularity of syntax to >> decide formatting, and several users want user preference to decide >> formatting. There do seem to be larger costs for letting the user >> decide; but there are also costs to not letting the user decide, that >> I feel are not being appreciated. > > Could you please be more specific about what the problem is? Apart from > the location of properties, are there other forms of flexible formatting > that have been lost in recent releases? And what specifically is the > problem with a required property drawer location? Is it aesthetic? > Functional? > Please disregard this bit. Just saw your reply to Achim. Matt