From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Sort error [9.0.9 (9.0.9-88-g251f88-elpa @
 /home/someone/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20170821/)]
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:55:51 +0200
Message-ID: <87o9qt1qm0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <MWHPR13MB145570ECE74F4419D092A534CD9E0@MWHPR13MB1455.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
	<87d17eqatr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r2vpg4wu.fsf@alphapapa.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44860)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1do3Ha-0007CF-Mr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 03:56:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1do3HV-0000xv-TA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 03:55:58 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:45735)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1do3HV-0000xT-Ml
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 03:55:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87r2vpg4wu.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Fri, 01
	Sep 2017 22:23:13 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes:

> Curious, I see that the functions org-clocking-buffer and
> org-clock-is-active are identical.  Should one of these be a deprecated
> alias?

Indeed, I noticed the same. 

This could be a first step, but we should also move all "org-clock-"
prefixed variables and functions (around line 4518 in "org.el") in
"org-clock.el", for clarity. There's no reason to have them clutter
"org.el".

Do you want to have a stab at it?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou