From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 15:31:30 +0100
Message-ID: <87o9l6uou5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <874lmyw4tb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<18493.1517668046@minshall-apollo.minshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35577)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ehyqr-0003li-QZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 09:31:35 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ehyqr-0005XX-3e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 09:31:33 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:35574)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1ehyqq-0005X1-Sa
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2018 09:31:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <18493.1517668046@minshall-apollo.minshall.org> (Greg Minshall's
	message of "Sat, 03 Feb 2018 21:27:26 +0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Greg Minshall <minshall@acm.org>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>

Greg Minshall <minshall@acm.org> writes:

> thanks for the reply.  i'd suggest reverting (most of) 7efa... so that
> foocall_foo() *stays* as foocall_foo().  (i.e., put the "\\<" back in
> front of "call_" and "sys_".)  otherwise, we have no (straight forward)
> way (am i right?  sometimes my head hurts!) to get a plain
> "foocall_foo()" in the output.

Of course we do: just write 

  foocall<ZSWP>_foo()

or

  foocall_foo<ZSWP>()

etc.