From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stardiviner Subject: Re: ob-clojure.el is not compatible with new CIDER API Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 19:59:24 +0800 Message-ID: <87o9eqp80z.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877elva0qj.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvoww51l.fsf@gmail.com> <87efftp83f.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: numbchild@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fjlaO-00056R-PE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 09:18:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fjlaK-00084j-7k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 09:18:12 -0400 Received: from [122.236.8.24] (port=2273 helo=dark.localdomain) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fjlaJ-000849-P5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 09:18:08 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Tim Cross Cc: Org-mode Tim Cross writes: > I did begin to look at it. From memory, the inf-clojure integration didn't look that hard, > but it did require some additional scaffolding to mae the comms work well. I then got > distracted with a new job and haven't had time to go back to it. Currently, I've not had time > to do any Clojure work, so it is not high on the priority list. > Can I see your work? Do you have any public source code repository online of this? -- [ stardiviner ] don't need to convince with trends. Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/ IRC(freenode): stardiviner GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3