From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kLuiL/yqkl70cwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:45:32 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id QCgvLP6qkl7qMgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:45:34 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF19D942D07 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNVQw-0000AB-GF for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 01:45:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNVQX-00009w-8g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 01:45:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNVQW-0003iC-6D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 01:45:05 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:53894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNVQV-0003fD-Q3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 01:45:04 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C300B5368; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 01:45:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=PyTXt0w07N0gUSbSPhBwgVs1LCQ=; b=AwSyRK COXUeRq11lSR0cvFvdcdKvE6pdJjCN360ACuDn+B5csgsbYICm3JGGosIv066Ifp mUjv+BvY6eU3qdr0itngfcIcpihQGuatiSpOR8XBuE0mwHqw50eLP8G4xZoC40NE tkZjFFR85Ats6ff7ybbuNiTMQXpoyxJ5RKVvQ= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4524FB5367; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 01:45:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=kyleam.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=jEDr24Ob/jWW7YdeWE2HM4/yLL7vxjVClCKcjaS8mxQ=; b=pvABoMsT5ahp16rzz2lonngTpef5KGVxIb3mi5Tha2xmyE877RhVTAuxGLoBu0CSZ/MooxCJyeSEu6N68RAMI6eoEZfw2MH1p3MN8wsx6WYXr88UXcn4wQ06fKqsfSoYeTa2XNeGjIJhZqwBWPXCxL6M2mEdl3T/9EvaLUxspFI= Received: from localhost (unknown [45.33.91.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACDF0B5364; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 01:44:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) From: Kyle Meyer To: Gustavo Barros Subject: Re: Bug: Repeating tasks no longer appearing on future dates in the agenda [9.3.6 (9.3.6-17-g389288-elpaplus @ /home/gustavo/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20200224/)] In-Reply-To: <878sj42os2.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <87imjqdtpo.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8tim83q.fsf@kyleam.com> <87lfn5j5dz.fsf@gmail.com> <878sj42os2.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:44:56 +0000 Message-ID: <87o8rx1cmf.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BED18592-7C80-11EA-9BE0-8D86F504CC47-24757444!pb-smtp21.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 173.228.157.53 X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Bastien Guerry , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, hhkg@protonmail.com Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 1.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=pobox.com header.s=sasl header.b=AwSyRK C; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=kyleam.com header.s=mesmtp header.b=pvABoMsT; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [1.49 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.57955486303618]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.29), country: US(-0.01), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.58)]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[pobox.com:s=sasl,kyleam.com:s=mesmtp]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[pobox.com:-,kyleam.com:-]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[kyle@kyleam.com,emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kyleam.com]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[bzg.fr,gnu.org,protonmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-TUID: 2/7dQcnxEp4+ Kyle Meyer writes: > I've sat down to work on it a few times and wasn't able to get anywhere > with the time I had available. It's on my list to revisit. However, as > we have no proposed fix, in my view it'd make sense to revert the > problematic commit, 39c656870. While that recent commit may resolve a > longstanding bug in the handling of one-time delays, it causes a > regression in functionality that I suspect is much more widely used and > relied on. > > I'll plan to revert the commit tomorrow. Please chime in if you > disagree with me doing so. Reverted in 1de7eabf2.