From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CKeIIkrjZF+XUgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:41:46 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KMd+HkrjZF9QQgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:41:46 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 245A1940221 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33750 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJJSC-0006Kx-7A for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:41:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJJQ2-0005tK-03 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:39:32 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:51924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJJPy-0008OU-2j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:39:29 -0400 Received: from [10.9.9.72] (helo=submission01.runbox) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJJPo-0000cn-7m; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:39:16 +0200 Received: by submission01.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (611856)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1kJJPe-0003Xe-Uz; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:39:07 +0200 References: <87r1rqled0.fsf@havana> <87k0xifa9h.fsf@gmail.com> <87d03art6a.fsf@havana> <87h7slgbi5.fsf@gmail.com> <352C7149-743F-4944-ACA5-7A1242B5A3AA@health.ucsd.edu> <87tuwa9ez4.fsf@gmail.com> <87pn6y9dqy.fsf@gmail.com> <48AD2294-E831-44D7-B564-0F7B4019C61B@health.ucsd.edu> <87ft7t9wqk.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6y1axhi.fsf@gmail.com> <1E0046A6-1FAB-45B5-9B08-68FE1BE98180@health.ucsd.edu> <874ko8b9tt.fsf@gmail.com> <0B0CCE1F-A34D-42E1-BF46-C767F41E8FE4@health.ucsd.edu> <871rjcb1za.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.5.5; emacs 26.3 From: Dylan Schwilk To: Jack Kamm Subject: Re: Help debugging R source code block output problem with :session In-reply-to: <871rjcb1za.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:39:03 -0500 Message-ID: <87o8m311lk.fsf@havana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=91.220.196.211; envelope-from=dylan@schwilk.org; helo=aibo.runbox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/18 12:39:17 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Berry, Charles" , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.51 X-TUID: FBIXKA2TZ3Jl Thanks. This patch works for my org files. On Tue 08 Sep 2020 at 12:41, Jack Kamm wrote: > Hi Chuck, > >> this is already present in `org-babel-R-evaluate-session' in >> the call to >> `org-babel-comint-eval-invisibly-and-wait-for-file'' just a >> couple of lines further down in the `(cl-case result-type >> (value ...))' branch. >> >> The other use of `tmp-file' in that block is the one that >> requires the prefix, right? >> >> So nothing more to fix. >> >> ?? > > You're right, I didn't notice that it's already present -- > nothing more > to fix. > > Jack --