From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id XQauHr1qv1/bGwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:41 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id eHT0Gb1qv192PQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:41 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F47D9404FD for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36600 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiCsL-0000GJ-IW for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:43:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiCrn-0000G9-N6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:43:03 -0500 Received: from mailer-211-152.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.152]:16608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiCrl-0005Ao-Dr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:43:03 -0500 Received: from lk.84.20.244.182.dc.cable.static.lj-kabel.net ([84.20.244.182] helo=Tauriel) by b1.hitrost.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kiCrZ-008UDx-Gu; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:42:50 +0100 References: <87mtz84om9.fsf@localhost> <87ft4zhyuo.fsf@disroot.org> <877dqbhtgf.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87zh36d1xn.fsf@web.de> <87y2iq6itk.fsf@gmail.com> <87eekhd1sq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.3.2 From: Christian Moe To: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: Local variables insecurities - Re: One vs many directories In-reply-to: <87eekhd1sq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:39:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87o8jk7brd.fsf@christianmoe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-GeoIP: Country [IP], SI [84.20.244.182] X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus Received-SPF: pass client-ip=91.185.211.152; envelope-from=mail@christianmoe.com; helo=mailer-211-152.hitrost.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Jean Louis Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: inc X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: Redn6B3DmIIC Located Eric's message and can confirm the same for mu4e (no query about setting/evaluating anything upon opening the message). cm Eric S Fraga writes: > On Wednesday, 25 Nov 2020 at 15:38, Jean Louis wrote: >> I have not configured anything. In fact I have opened the email and I >> was surprised that I am getting those dialogues to execute local >> variables. > > Very strange. It was my email that instigated this part of the > thread. I can view my email and I do not get asked to set any locate > variables or, in this case, evaluate the elisp expression. Out of > curiosity, what mail reader did you use that actually interprets file > local variables? Gnus article view does not.