From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: Re: Headline with 2 timestamps is displayed only once in the agenda Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:47:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87mya93wi9.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87ljpu2xb5.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <873ac22dzm.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <499EF9D6-DA8B-4F38-8581-C7FEB6FED4DA@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwY7U-0004kM-4j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:47:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwY7P-0004jc-5Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:47:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35447 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LwY7O-0004jZ-Vr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:47:47 -0400 Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]:6657) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LwY7O-0002Ti-Ed for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:47:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <499EF9D6-DA8B-4F38-8581-C7FEB6FED4DA@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:34:37 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: Hi Carsten, >> Why does org stop with the first match? Efficiency? At least I >> don't care about that, so if this could be made customizable I >> wouldn't object. > > Efficiency, and to avoid cluttering if you have recorded several time > stamps in an entry. See, the problem is that all these lines will > look exactly the same in the agenda, because they all show the same > headline! > > However, I do see that your applications, with a different > time-of-day, does in fact make sense. > > Anyway, get the latest version and do > > (setq org-agenda-find-multiple-timestamps-per-entry t) Carsten, you are incredible! > Question to everyone: Should this be the default? I tend to t. If an entry has more than one timestamp for a day, then it looks like an exception to me. If not, then the entry should have a better structure, i.e. if it was --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- * Some meeting with Hugo <2009-04-22 Wed> - breakfast <2009-04-22 Wed 09:44> - lunch <2009-04-22 Wed 12:44> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- it should better be: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- * Some meeting with Hugo <2009-04-22 Wed> ** breakfast <2009-04-22 Wed 09:44> ** lunch <2009-04-22 Wed 12:44> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Or if you don't want the breakfast and lunch in the agenda anyway, one could use 09:44 or an inactive timestamp instead. Bye, Tassilo -- VI VI VI - The Roman Number Of The Beast