From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: unicorn image is not a link back to the front page on orgmode.org Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:02:30 -0400 Message-ID: <87my7wl5kp.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> References: <487323a00906240639w1e4789ebjca5689decd03e795@mail.gmail.com> <87bpodirx8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y6rhh72x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <71454fac0906241117r337a565ey6cde3f6269c55094@mail.gmail.com> <87tz25h227.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <877hz1bfe0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87bpoch3fi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87skhol75c.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <6AAB5C90-C0F1-4395-BF2A-63358434A40B@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJqTJ-00047R-JY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:02:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJqTF-000478-Bl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:02:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59675 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJqTF-000475-5C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:02:37 -0400 Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:54469) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJqTE-0004nv-Kl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:02:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6AAB5C90-C0F1-4395-BF2A-63358434A40B@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu\, 25 Jun 2009 16\:27\:43 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, James Yoo Carsten Dominik writes: > On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > >> Bastien writes: >>> Carsten Dominik writes: >>> >>>> What would be wrong with pulling the image out of the >>>> background and making it directly clickable? >>> >>> None, I've done this. > > Great. I am also more comfortable with this because invisible > clicking areas are notoriously used by fishing sites to make users > believe they click one thing, and in fact they click another. > > At least this is how I interpret what I hear. Lets try to keep > things transparent..... ^^^^^^^^^^ you mean opaque ;) It's the invisible clicky things that are the problem :) -Bernt