From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Rose Subject: Re: Re: Aligning Columns in HTML Export Tables Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:25:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87mxq7y8xc.fsf@gmx.de> References: <878w1svl7y.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <8739s09yso.fsf@gmx.de> <4CBFED67.1010609@christianmoe.com> <33AC82F7-1A50-4265-BA1C-B86462E76CCD@gmail.com> <87y69ry9ws.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39242 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8v9N-0003Ff-Uo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:25:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8v9M-00062J-Es for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:25:45 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:37497 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8v9M-000621-1y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:25:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y69ry9ws.fsf@gmx.de> (Sebastian Rose's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:04:19 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Bernt Hansen , Jeff Horn , Org-mode ml , mail@christianmoe.com Sebastian Rose writes: > Carsten Dominik writes: >> On Oct 21, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Christian Moe wrote: >> >>> On 10/21/10 2:25 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote: >>> (...) >>>>> >>>>> | | | | >>>>> | A | B | C | >>>>> | 1 | 2 | 3 | >>>>> | 12 | 13 | 300 | >>>>> | 9 | 11 | 4 | >>>> >>>> >>>> I get >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> as expected. >>> >>> That's interesting. From the same example I get >>> >>> >> /> >>> >>> ...using freshly pulled 7.01trans. What might account for the difference? >> >> Actually, I also get what Christian gets. Sebastian, how did you get something >> different? > > > I guess I just didn't pull for a few days. > > Nononono, just kidding :) > > I tried my own table, which is different: > > a) The line is the last one. > b) There's an empty extra column, the first one, as the docs propose. > This column contains in the first cell of the " | " line a > slash: > > | | A | B | C | > | | 1 | 2 | 3 | > | | 12 | 13 | 300 | > | | 9 | 11 | 4 | > | / | | | | > > > All this does not help. But the third difference might be the key: > > c) The table is a captured column view ("#+BEGIN: columnview...") with > 293 lines. Well, OK, forget it... It was just that my s and s matched with the sensible thing to do for each column. Seems it's just looking at the numbers and says "OK, numbers only, right aligned", just as you said in a previous mail. | | A | B | C | |---+-----+------+------| | | 1 | bar | text | | | 12 | test | 300 | | | 9 | foo | 4 | | / | | | | gives us Sebastian