From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Lundin Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:41:49 -0500 Message-ID: <87mxmvy43m.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrs3hge.fsf@gmail.com> <871v48s3xu.fsf@fastmail.fm> <10576.1295493005@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60544 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pfwe0-0002i6-Q0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:41:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfwdz-0000dk-V8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:41:52 -0500 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:34465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfwdz-0000dd-Qz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:41:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <10576.1295493005@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:10:05 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Jason Dunsmore , Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Nick Dokos writes: > Matt Lundin wrote: > >> So the new, "flat" FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are >> welcome to suggest or contribute further refinements. >> > > Blue (or purple or similar color) text on black background is unreadable - > at least to my eyes. I agree. I reverted the black background. If a dark background is preferred, we'll need to make sure that we export an entire dark color theme (such as zenburn) with org-export-htmlize-generate-css. As it stood, we were simply using a black background with colors exported from a light theme (e.g, dark blue headlines). Needless to say, this made the text unreadable. :) Best, Matt