From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: C-c C-c no longer renumbers ordered lists
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:40:20 +0100
Message-ID: <87mx9svmyj.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <183D76E3-8031-47BF-A9EC-D68DB5B5DA4B@landerfamily.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39449)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1RlOfL-0006hj-1m
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:42:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1RlOfK-0004vU-1L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:42:18 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:63541)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1RlOfJ-0004vL-TD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:42:18 -0500
Received: by werf1 with SMTP id f1so2045635wer.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:42:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <183D76E3-8031-47BF-A9EC-D68DB5B5DA4B@landerfamily.ca> (Anthony
	Lander's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:20:41 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Anthony Lander <anthony@landerfamily.ca>
Cc: emacs-orgmode Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Anthony Lander <anthony@landerfamily.ca> writes:

> It seems that C-c C-c no longer renumbers ordered lists.

True. This should now be fixed.

Thanks for reporting it.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou