From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: New tutorial on using Emacs lisp for Org spreadsheet formulas
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:39:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mx92sp61.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pqdzt6em.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:27:29 +0100")
Hello,
Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
>> I don't see what is clumsy with affiliated keywords.
>
> Well, you write the arguments before starting the source block, getting
> everything wardbacks (and I don't think that's easier to parse, but you
> would know better(*)).
I think you're mixing src blocks and Babel. A src block contains,
fontifies and allows to edit source code. Babel arguments (or caption,
or name) are meta-data that applies to the whole src block element, not
to its contents.
> Last but not least I can never remember if any of the "#+" stuff is
> supposed to end with a ":"
Affiliated keywords all do. If one doesn't, it's a bug.
> and whether it wants another ":" in front of the arguments or not.
That's another topic, and I agree that, at one point or another, we'll
have to unify the way parameters are written. IMO, Babel usage is a good
standard.
> (*) Reminds me I'll have to try what happens if I write header
> arguments that are detached from the source block. Devious, I know,
> but the manual does not really specify anything.
But Org elements does. Affiliated keywords must be attached to their
relative element.
> If you look carefully, that source block above does not contain a
> drawer. It has a (hypothetical) associated multiline header argument
> that happens to look and feel like a drawer.
Then it's a duck.
>> Though, drawers can contain src-blocks.
>
> Is there any specification that they must fully contain them?
You may want to read comments in org-element.el. I also posted some
explanations when I announced the library.
> Anyway, that was just an idea and if nobody likes it, that's fine with
> me, too.
I just wanted to let you know that the idea of putting "quasi-drawers"
within a src-block is against the model described by the current parser.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-31 17:33 Bastien
2012-01-31 18:33 ` Achim Gratz
2012-01-31 19:31 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2012-01-31 20:01 ` Achim Gratz
2012-01-31 20:55 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2012-02-01 6:27 ` Achim Gratz
2012-02-01 12:39 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2012-02-01 6:10 ` Jude DaShiell
2012-01-31 22:29 ` Carsten Dominik
2012-02-01 6:37 ` Achim Gratz
2012-02-01 6:56 ` Carsten Dominik
2012-02-01 7:03 ` Bastien
2012-02-01 17:29 ` Achim Gratz
2012-02-01 7:14 ` Bastien
2012-02-01 15:39 ` Eric S Fraga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mx92sp61.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
--cc=Stromeko@nexgo.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--subject='Re: New tutorial on using Emacs lisp for Org spreadsheet formulas' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).