From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: new style of html export for documents with code blocks -- based on docco Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:34:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87mx662whf.fsf@altern.org> References: <87iph3qorz.fsf@gmx.com> <87k41av9vh.fsf@altern.org> <87haweh6ik.fsf@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39479) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLGlm-0001s5-C9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:33:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLGlk-0006kA-DT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:33:13 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:39293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLGlk-0006j9-3y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:33:12 -0400 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so667962wib.12 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:33:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87haweh6ik.fsf@gmx.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:33:55 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Schulte writes: > Bastien writes: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> Eric Schulte writes: >> >>> This is a simple little hack, and I don't really have time to turn it >>> into anything more than that, but the following may be used to generate >>> nice side-by-side docco-style exports of Org-mode documents with code >>> blocks. >>> >>> http://eschulte.me/org-docco/org-docco.html >> >> Can you please add this somewhere on Worg? >> >> Thanks! > > I was going to, but couldn't think of a good place. If I add the actual > Org-mode file to the contrib directory of the repository then I could > add it to the worg/org-contrib section. Does that sound appropriate? Yes it does, please go ahead! Thanks, -- Bastien