From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: Org/LaTeX set-up for business letters? Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 21:00:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87mx3ejan4.fsf@googlemail.com> References: <8762a2l6f7.fsf@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmrFk-00072P-Vj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:58:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmrFj-0003z0-D6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:58:12 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmrFj-0003yu-6P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:58:11 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SmrFg-0005AL-8K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:58:08 +0200 Received: from g231225180.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.225.180]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:58:08 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by g231225180.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:58:08 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org suvayu ali writes: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Thorsten Jolitz > wrote: >> although using Emacs/Org-mode for almost everything, I still write my >> "official" correspondence with a (quite nice) OpenOffice template. It >> would be so much easier and faster to just use Org mode for that too. > > You can use opendocument export and use your Libreoffice template with > it. Check the archives for Jambunathan's post detailing how to do > that. Ok, thanks, though that would not be my perfered solution. -- cheers, Thorsten