From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: bug#12905: 24.2.50; org: edit source block causes data loss Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:25:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87mwxhyl5l.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <50A62865.8010904@gmail.com> <87sj7han8a.fsf__16482.9143243425$1354894646$gmane$org@gnu.org> <87wqwnyzud.fsf__32428.3239235685$1355331429$gmane$org@bzg.ath.cx> <87bodzt201.fsf@norang.ca> <877gom7tc3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <876246skbt.fsf@norang.ca> <87lid262rf.fsf@norang.ca> <8738za44ss.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878v925aru.fsf@norang.ca> <87wqwm0yoi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjBb4-0005wU-Bi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:25:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjBaz-0001tn-KV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:25:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:62901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjBaz-0001tI-EM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:25:13 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hn17so3844548wib.12 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:25:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Le Wang's message of "Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:06:34 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Le Wang Cc: Bernt Hansen , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Le Wang writes: > I haven't investigated further though. We can easily setup a mirror on github and use the platform from this repo. But I'm unsure how this would work. If someone wants to take this in charge, let me know. > I've attached 3 patches to fix this and another bug I found while > writing tests. Ah, our patches crossed. I superseded the first one with my patch, and just applied the third one. Can you explain the bug behind the second one? Thanks! -- Bastien