From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Indentation of backend definitioon
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:32:22 +0100
Message-ID: <87mwu5bojt.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CBB542D5-8D8F-41BA-B73D-9CFC41E0B30D@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36837)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UGGhN-000536-G6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:32:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UGGhM-0002Ta-DI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:32:33 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:34237)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UGGhM-0002TO-7A
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:32:32 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ds1so1606825wgb.16
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CBB542D5-8D8F-41BA-B73D-9CFC41E0B30D@gmail.com> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:52:19 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: Emacs Org mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

> I propose the following patch to improve the automatic
> indentation of the backend definition macros in ox.el.
>
> - Carsten
>
> diff --git a/lisp/ox.el b/lisp/ox.el
> index c5b6d7c..31983b2 100644
> --- a/lisp/ox.el
> +++ b/lisp/ox.el
> @@ -987,6 +987,7 @@ keywords are understood:
>  	    ',export-block))
>         ;; Splice in the body, if any.
>         ,@body)))
> +(put 'org-export-define-backend 'lisp-indent-function 1)
>  
>  (defmacro org-export-define-derived-backend (child parent &rest body)
>    "Create a new back-end as a variant of an existing one.
> @@ -1078,6 +1079,7 @@ The back-end could then be called with, for example:
>  	    ',export-block))
>         ;; Splice in the body, if any.
>         ,@body)))
> +(put 'org-export-define-derived-backend 'lisp-indent-function 2)
>  
>  (defun org-export-backend-parent (backend)
>    "Return back-end from which BACKEND is derived, or nil."
> @@ -5201,6 +5203,7 @@ and
>  			   (message "Process '%s' exited abnormally" p))
>  		       (unless org-export-async-debug
>  			 (delete-file ,,temp-file)))))))))))))
> +(put 'org-export-async-start 'lisp-indent-function 1)
>  
>  (defun org-export-add-to-stack (source backend &optional process)
>    "Add a new result to export stack if not present already.

Isn't it the default behaviour (see `declare' in definitions)?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou