From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: ob-clojure.el alternative using nrepl
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 17:54:18 +0200
Message-ID: <87mwmqpcyd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <CAA01p3oZ6hrxA8zs9yqz1MXk1T9fTarAfkL9M=xB9-9O1Dnvmw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57237)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1VRlEV-0002Fv-Uy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:54:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1VRlEN-00075u-IG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:54:31 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]:42452)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1VRlEN-00075c-Ac
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:54:23 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hn9so216137wib.11
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA01p3oZ6hrxA8zs9yqz1MXk1T9fTarAfkL9M=xB9-9O1Dnvmw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Oleh's message of "Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:45:33 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Oleh <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>
Cc: org mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Oleh,

Oleh <ohwoeowho@gmail.com> writes:

> Current method of clojure evaluation is through slime.
> I couldn't get it to work, when I tried long ago.
> So I attach one that uses nrepl.
> Switching between the two should be as easy as using
>
> (require 'ob-clojure)
> or
> (require 'ob-clojure-nrepl).

Nice, something needed.  I guess we should rather have an option for
this in ob-clojure.el, letting users decide whether they want to use
nrepl.el or slime, a sensible default being to use nrepl.el.

What do you think?

-- 
 Bastien