From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: parser: verbatim or code? Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:23:41 -0500 Message-ID: <87mwhsfo9e.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87iosg1oge.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37369) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEg9u-0006P9-Oj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:24:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEg9o-0008J6-QU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:23:58 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEg9o-0008Iu-Jf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:23:52 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WEg9n-00035n-81 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:23:51 +0100 Received: from pool-98-110-172-167.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([98.110.172.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:23:51 +0100 Received: from ndokos by pool-98-110-172-167.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:23:51 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Yasushi SHOJI writes: > Hello, > > While writing a new exporter I've noticed that `=' is actually for > verbatim and `~' is for code emphasis despite the fact that the > current org manual says: > > You can make words *bold*, /italic/, _underlined_, =code= and > ~verbatim~ > > Is this documentation bug? > I think it's a code bug: ~verbatim~ is the precedent-setting latex convention. However fixing it might break existing documents (although in many instances code and verbatim are treated equivalently, so that might not be much of a problem). -- Nick