From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Not a standard Org-mode time string Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:39:08 -0500 Message-ID: <87mwhpdu0j.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFaam-0004Dj-3i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:39:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFaae-0003vi-Os for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:39:28 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59547) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFaae-0003vd-Ih for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:39:20 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFaad-00049d-3g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 03:39:19 +0100 Received: from pool-98-110-172-167.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([98.110.172.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 03:39:19 +0100 Received: from ndokos by pool-98-110-172-167.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 03:39:19 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Charles Turner writes: > ... > Generating tree-style sitemap for Charles' Notes [6 times] > condition-case: Bad timestamp `Saturday, 28.05.2011 ' > Error was: (Not a standard Org-mode time string: Saturday, 28.05.2011 ) > > I don't understand the time-stamp messages. Can anyone help me debug > this problem? I don't think Org likes the format 28.05.2011 - try changing it to 2011-05-28 and see if the error goes away - although I don't really know where tha timestamp came from: please provide a backtrace. Read the org manual, section 1.4, "Feedback", to find out how to produce a useful backtrace. -- Nick