From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed bug in org-entry-get-with-inheritance Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:49:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87mwgoppvf.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87bnx9qbcq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vbvcptqt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ob14d4o7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r460pr8d.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ha6wd3hg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPdXe-00033u-4U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:49:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPdXY-0006df-Dv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:49:46 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPdXY-0006db-7f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:49:40 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WPdXV-00020c-Jv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:49:37 +0100 Received: from pd9eb1a5e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.235.26.94]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:49:37 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb1a5e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:49:37 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Achim Gratz writes: > >>> Can you tell a bit more about what's wrong with the test? >> >> There is nothing wrong with those tests. > > I meant: can you tell me how the tests fail? They don't produce the result they are supposed to produce. > I'm interested in the answer. make BTEST_RE='\\(header-arg-defaults\\|property-accumulation\\)' test-dirty >>> If the patch is good and the tests are outdated, I'd rather >>> fix the tests than revert the patch to re-revert it again. >> >> No, the patch is bad, otherwise it wouldn't break the tests. > > Sorry, I don't buy this. I'm not selling anything. > Or maybe explain me why the patch is wrong. It breaks property inheritance and accumulation. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada