From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: still seeing semi-regular lockups Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:40:45 -0700 Message-ID: <87mwd1gz5e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87siocrbyb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87siobtn1i.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ha4r1j91.fsf@tanger.home> <87k39hdf2o.fsf@tanger.home> <87ppj86elt.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874n0kde2y.fsf@tanger.home> <87bnus4s5n.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87egye7kx3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87a992mleu.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mwd1hbpx.fsf@fastmail.fm> <877g45jv61.fsf@tanger.home> <87vbrph00m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874mz9mlw4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzilN-0005Me-Vi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 04:41:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzilI-00057y-J5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 04:41:05 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzilI-00057o-8Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 04:41:00 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WzilF-0004gz-Cb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:40:57 +0200 Received: from c-76-28-195-250.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([76.28.195.250]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:40:57 +0200 Received: from eric by c-76-28-195-250.hsd1.wa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:40:57 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Hi Eric, > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I think the advice here was also to run Org uncompiled, as that produces >> a more useful backtrace, is that right? > > Yes, that's right -- generally, backtraces from compiled Org are > mungled, while backtraces from an uncompiled Org are readable. > >> A couple of times I've gotten >> SIGUSR2 to knock emacs out of a lock, but it was only while I was >> running a compiled org. The one time I was running uncompiled and got a >> lock, even SIGUSR2 couldn't bring it back... > > Yes, compilation does not affect whether or not you can escape a lock. Right, I didn't mean to imply that, just that SIGUSR2 doesn't always bring it back from the dead...