From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Change property drawer syntax Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:51:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87mw7zqnn5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87oatek909.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87siiadfbj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877fzkcojr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86fvdwsk7e.fsf@example.com> <87a941yfco.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86r3xb4atc.fsf@example.com> <87r3xbqqwl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <867fz348rd.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59159) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnnV8-0006yK-QT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:51:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnnV1-0002Nn-64 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:51:18 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnnV0-0002Nd-Vz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:51:11 -0500 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XnnUz-0005Jd-MG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:51:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <867fz348rd.fsf@example.com> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:04:06 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Sebastien Vauban writes: > Isn't that somehow duplicate with `org-indent-mode' (which I don't > enable either)? `org-indent-mode' sets `org-adapt-indentation' to nil _and_ indents virtually (no modification to the document) body as if `org-adapt-indentation' wasn't nil. There's no duplication here. > Would I want to let the indentation following the level of the entries, > I'm not sure what I'd have to do: > > - (org-indent-mode), and/or > - (setq org-adapt-indentation t)? I cannot decide for you. But editing will certainly be snappier without `org-indent-mode' active. > [1] And that simplifies A LOT file diffs... > > Hence, another question: shouldn't the default be reversed (no > adaption of indentation, by default)? I like the current default. However I don't mind changing it if it is very uncommon among users to set it to a non-nil value. Note that it doesn't appear in . Admittedly, the survey is outdated. Regards,