From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Slade Subject: Re: (org-agenda-to-appt) with sexp org-diary-class entry? Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 15:16:29 -0700 Message-ID: <87mw6zw1fm.fsf@jnanam.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48593) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xxk8D-0002i2-VK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:16:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xxk87-00010G-NZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:16:45 -0500 Received: from mail-s40.mailgun.us ([184.173.153.40]:33584) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xxk87-0000zR-JO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:16:39 -0500 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: marcowahlsoft@gmail.com Thanks, Marco. Well, it at least helps to update me to a non-obsolete sexp method. I have no idea how to check what's actually been pushed to `appt` to see whether the updated org-class really behaves differently to org-diary-class in this respect. (So I'll have to see tomorrow how `appt` behaves.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dr Benjamin Slade pgp fingerprint: 21BA 2AE1 28F6 DF36 110A 0E9C A320 BBE8 2B52 EE19 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ {sent by mu4e on Emacs running under GNU/Linux} (Choose Linux, Choose Freedom)