From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: C-x RET r utf-8 RET Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:09:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87mw6y8hsc.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> References: <87d27uzn8g.fsf@skimble.plus.com> <87iohm1tnf.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r3wa8qt8.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87mw6yzdi8.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42981) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xxx8C-0005fU-RP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:09:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xxx8B-0004Ew-NE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:09:36 -0500 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:55403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xxx8B-0004Em-Fn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:09:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0243E18E99D for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:09:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ylu5obdPEpgg for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:09:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2001:808:114:6:cd5c:5a59:47e8:3b0e]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D476D18E996 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:09:32 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <87mw6yzdi8.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2014-12-08, at 10:39, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > No, you're quite right, I was just answering off the cuff, without > thorough thought. It is indeed possible to stick (interactive) inside of > a lambda, though intuition tells me that that it's not generally good > practice -- Emacs' introspection functions will probably at some point > bark at you for not having a named function, and it will make it harder > to use the built-in help functions to figure out what's going on. But > yes, you're right, it's definitely possible. You're probably right - describe-key works (of course), but in an ideal way (somehow jumping to the source won't work;-) - but a docstring will!). > E Best. -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University