From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Publishing on Worg succeeds or fails? -- I can't say! Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:00:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87mw20c4rx.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <86fv7sm2lm.fsf@example.com> <87vbgoc60b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86fv7svtdp.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yl0nc-0007v2-TE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:59:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yl0nZ-0006zX-HS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:59:08 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yl0nZ-0006z6-AK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:59:05 -0400 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yl0nX-00019l-TC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:59:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86fv7svtdp.fsf@example.com> (Fabrice Niessen's message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:46:10 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Fabrice Niessen Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Fabrice Niessen writes: > Could that be stated clearly in the output? You should ask to whom implemented Worg. > The thing is that I did not touch those links, as you can see in my > commit. So, somehow, Org became more strict. And the fact that that file > wasn't modified for some time means it wasn't re-exported for the same > period; hence, the problem was never found -- until someone modifies > whatever in the file... Correct. > IOW, shouldn't all files be published each time, to spot such problems > as soon as they become problems (because of syntax changes, for > example), instead of being much later, whenever the file is changed (if > it ever is)? So you get 50-100 files to fix instead of the one you modified? IMO, it would be a waste to re-publish unmodified files. You only have to consider syntax changes when updating a file. > OK, I'll see whether it can help. Note that you need to have a very recent Org (less than 7 hours) to use it. Regards,