From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: pdflatex not found? Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:03:14 -0400 Message-ID: <87mvv575z1.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <6sw6c7ziz5e8ik.fsf@pfdstudio.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqnzU-0001Ys-UL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:03:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqnzQ-0003q9-T1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:03:36 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqnzQ-0003ol-ME for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:03:32 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqnzK-0002uZ-0W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:03:26 +0100 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:03:25 +0100 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:03:25 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Peter Davis writes: > I'm trying to export PDF from org, but I'm getting the error: > > pdflatex: Command not found. [3 times] > > I've checked the definition of exec-path, and it includes > "/usr/texbin", which is where tcsh tells me the executable is. > > Any ideas? > Backtrace? (setq debug-on-error t) and do the export again, possibly with uncompiled code: (info "(org) Feedback") for the details of producing a useful backtrace. This should be SOP for any errors, *before* you post a question to the list. You don't have to be able to read the backtrace; there are people on the list who can and it makes the diagnosis *much* easier by pruning the tree of "how did we get there" down to its essentials. It will also help me avoid sounding like a broken record. And all instances of "you" is plural and all-inclusive ;-) -- Nick