From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Formatting dates in org-html postamble
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:33:34 +0100
Message-ID: <87mvgvlspd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAE4=OQ8DAsxfzpairY7GHOxo5e19ieseUT0jVPcq03yKwr-obg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52139)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1c821h-0003Uo-4s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 04:33:38 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1c821g-0007Tu-7z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 04:33:37 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:42921)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1c821g-0007Ta-2a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 04:33:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAE4=OQ8DAsxfzpairY7GHOxo5e19ieseUT0jVPcq03yKwr-obg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Pavel Panchekha's message of "Sat, 19 Nov 2016 00:45:32 -0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pavel Panchekha <me@pavpanchekha.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Pavel Panchekha <me@pavpanchekha.com> writes:

> I've been trying to set the date format in the HTML postamble. It looks
> like a date given in #+DATE is not being formatted according to the date
> format specification, but if no #+DATE is given, the format specification
> is used.
>
> Is this intended behavior=E2=80=94should I write formatted dates in #+DAT=
E?

We need more information to answer this.=20

What exactly did you try (configured variables, #+DATE keyword ...)?
What Org version are you using? What did you expect?

If you have some spare time,
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html> may be a good
read.

Regards,

--=20
Nicolas Goaziou