From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug] org 9 hangs on link search Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:29:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87mvfu3ia9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <8760mugkpw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pokt5ie3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87poks51n1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32920) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIDBT-0002LJ-KE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 06:29:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIDBS-00053w-Ve for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 06:29:47 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:49195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIDBS-00053J-PF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 06:29:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:03:37 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > ***** bug > ******* [[file:$dorg/executive--a.org::*%5B%5Bfile:$dorg/executive--a.org::*test%5D%5Btest%5D%5D][test]] > link to next header > captured > says no match for fuzzy expression > ******* [[file:$dorg/executive--a.org::*test][test]] > works > ******* test > ******* template Currently Org has no satisfactory way to handle square brackets within links' path or description. Percent-escaping (e.g., "%5B")is not one. I suggest to use a custom ID for the time being. > i substituted $dorg but would prefer it to > literally put "$dorg". > > ("n" "note" entry (file+headline ,todo "xyzzy-remember") > ;; unrelated issue is if i do spc bef and after ? then > ;; double space; else ret will follow link. i make > ;; capture not follow. > "* %?%a\n%i") If you think there is another bug, please start another thread and provide as much information as you can. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou