From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Add ob-sclang.el for sclang Org-mode babel support in contrib/
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:34:35 +0200
Message-ID: <87mv95ofs4.fsf@bzg.fr>
References: <CAL1eYu+m5-siM-YQDg+G-1frV=Fx7Qh00kLRaHxtfrkY9AexDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ink4z27l.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAL1eYu+s=Zqsttj2T6Kyo2FGDXTy_vv5JasBbXDtes74vOcUOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87y3suis4y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAL1eYuLA4v33eh8sUkFKVxOLRCp=t+xmfiHt4n7XGywzi6=mNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wp8dpgsf.fsf@bzg.fr>
	<CAL1eYuJ4uvn+RzRpWjJEm9zej8GhNak60iN7VuO+ZuTQMjMdhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fuey28ch.fsf@bzg.fr> <87bmpmg058.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48279)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1dMVfS-0007PB-0I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 04:34:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1dMVfR-0006p1-DL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 04:34:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87bmpmg058.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Sat, 17 Jun 2017 16:27:15 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> I'm not sure to understand commit
> a023d670eceb9121ef6a511b108fd82265e6d6a8.  In particular, why did
> you remove lexical binding? It really should be active in every
> library, and is the default when you create a new one.

I didn't know lexical binding was now the default when creating a
library.

Still: when it is not used, why adding it?

-- 
 Bastien