From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Scheme code evaluation in fresh Emacs
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:30:18 +0100
Message-ID: <87mv2ejz1x.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <f7e3220e-cb5f-928b-e659-fb2ab1b276ce@ossau.homelinux.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56168)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eRNap-0001zo-0e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:30:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eRNao-0002VT-6N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:30:23 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:46430)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1eRNao-0002Uo-0A
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:30:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: <f7e3220e-cb5f-928b-e659-fb2ab1b276ce@ossau.homelinux.net> (Neil
	Jerram's message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:29:35 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>
Cc: org-mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.homelinux.net> writes:

> When I try to evaluate Scheme code in an Emacs where I haven't yet
> done any Geiser/Scheme work, I get an error about
> geiser-default-implementation being undefined.=C2=A0 The attached patch
> fixes that, but I am not sure if it is the most minimal fix possible.=C2=
=A0
> WDYT?

Thank you. I applied the patch.

I think it would be worth notifying upstream about it, if you have some
spare time.

Regards,

--=20
Nicolas Goaziou