From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joseph Vidal-Rosset Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 17:15:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87muzpm8za.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bmhooaj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvveqi7u.fsf@bzg.fr> <87wp0a57i5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d121yhwf.fsf@bzg.fr> <874llxikm4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zi3pcvid.fsf@bzg.fr> <87y3j9gzy5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bmg5xic2.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es9oU-0002BS-9E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 11:15:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es9oT-0007An-Cj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 11:15:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87bmg5xic2.fsf@bzg.fr> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Sat, 03 Mar 2018 16:57:33 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Guerry Cc: Achim Gratz , Org Mode List , Nicolas Goaziou Le sam. 03 mars 2018 =C3=A0 04:57:33 , Bastien Guerry a envo= y=C3=A9 ce message: > The rationale for using org.org (which, I agree, sounds a bit > childish) is that this is the current convention for naming GNU > manual is [package-name].[extension]. > > See emacs.texi, gnus.texi, calc.texi, etc. > > If using Org becomes popular, it makes sense to have emacs.org, > gnus.org, calc.org but I find emacs-manual.org, gnus-manual.org > calc-manual.org to be cumbersome. > > Ok, we're not there yet, I know :) > > But still: RMS recently raised the question on emacs-devel of > whether using .rst for the GNU documentation would be better, > so using .org for this purpose is not entirely hypothetical. > > What people think? Let's just collect votes on this. > > +1 for org.org I agree. An expression that is both justified by a convention and that sounds silly or childish, is like a slogan that everybody has fun to repeat: "org.org" is terrific ! +1 for org.org Jo.=20