emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
To: Matt <matt@excalamus.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [WORG] Maintenance: on the frequency of bugfix releases
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 12:27:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msuiqm3n.fsf@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18c53a35fe4.10a58b2751952843.4346802837649365217@excalamus.com>

Matt <matt@excalamus.com> writes:

> Not part of the patch, but part of the context: "you shoud *NOT*" -> "you should *NOT*" (missing the 'l')  Already fixed and pushed (https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg/commit/a11b256086d567d0894d337b548ec13049a8731b)

Thanks!

> Regarding the patch, it seems reasonable.  
>
> Potentially stupid question, asked without knowing precisely what's involved with a bugfix release (it seems like a matter of tagging and pushing?)...what's the problem with making a new release for every fix?  Frequency of fixes?  Time required to make the release?  Storage?

While most of the commits on bugfix are safe to include into release
(see https://orgmode.org/worg/org-maintenance.html#branches),
sometimes we do introduce new bugs on bugfix. As a recent example, see
the fixup! commit on
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/log/?h=bugfix where
I had to fix an accidental breakage on older Emacs versions that I
introduced in the previous fix.

Doing the releases too frequently will increase a chance of such bugs
crawling into ELPA releases. So, there should be at least a minimal
waiting period to get a chance to handle such problems.

Sometimes, we also need to fix critical bugs - these may be tricky and
require some more testing before exposing to wide public.

That's why there should be some not-too-long and not-too-short interval
between bugfix releases.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-10 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-10 11:28 [PATCH] [WORG] Maintenance: on the frequency of bugfix releases Ihor Radchenko
2023-12-10 12:11 ` Matt
2023-12-10 12:27   ` Ihor Radchenko [this message]
2023-12-10 12:39     ` Matt
2023-12-11  6:29 ` Bastien Guerry
2023-12-11 11:34   ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-12-11 13:46     ` Bastien Guerry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87msuiqm3n.fsf@localhost \
    --to=yantar92@posteo.net \
    --cc=bzg@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=matt@excalamus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).