From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:700:3204::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id WNYSHo4PoGWDSAAAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:55:58 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id aO9uFo4PoGV7XQEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:55:58 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=jIQvAqWY; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1704988558; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=RX2MXQAhayvlXnDCn4exJNWcT+7RsVDLo/KIF9wSkN8=; b=j17RFGNX3McyLtHZM1u4uxp+V82j9iRCdXg7geuYtSwYNEBslNhwOQIoCSOqMzblnUhEG5 HTrII+P7xfK386RChVPydhC/fMt2rJqMgTW7467tfCVVOdDuZNm3BUMM9ssxd7frsmR7hI zqXqaBOQ1PU1mww8Rp+7fuzaDu/NvA2sDkFYl9wbig634KwtJHvVfkEYpATOSuUS1FIOl1 8jqwroXAOzOmFuPTggEMskF3nh39K9nGj5biuM2VqUcgEubDQhUnYwp9f9il3QBfSTHZHr 1SbOi7YrQGZ5P4gOvXem3K5i4QlcpQbvb4ocRD6z20MruUeq0tSyeM3nOxgW7Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=jIQvAqWY; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1704988558; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Jc+VeF/BSkqfS0XKM0XA/9nZzEh1lSrxUF865wBo9DTLHWVrH4an8qnFG15wiX2W+fKsmt z0uGd0IOkdUBRoUC7WS1RzhBm6MQ8xLniZ8baRxAKGdly9BtrvpYUceCQGaA9Cp9wsPtry hDzVIfM4XSifTShVfdi1MvmNFI+3Mdyzbn+Q9qNDAVn2MjDRATQes0fVD7HANfufNMKMMB G0H7DD8fD0qzgLMuV2dl1TcHKZQxl5RUYGwgO5E3g5B1n4i/I/H4MraGQ042Iqk0k6pCEu 2PSE8w4fMZivauqUdTwNHtYO0/H0VZ3iTy0ULJKKHFKy7ByRGo3Dq77Um5oPIA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E1F85FB for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:55:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNxOV-0001Qc-E5; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:54:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNxOQ-0001PS-AB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:54:55 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNxOK-0003gq-7W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:54:51 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712AD240104 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:54:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1704988485; bh=gw6LpD8eWHaa+IDEP2ZqyaQKc2XE7rmpUUqv1AwfL+4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=jIQvAqWYObKeyWm8lF+yrlenCIvmE66TR7Lq/YH2KMPBXCyjoqicPTRwzfZZb9MQg W/aHHTcIQgBq38BbmSyjjNLErNrRuK8ksCbk76Jw617k1UXEgwm3KYC+qBQ/56kr0R 7KIRonClJ3kkaB+hH9h25OfOiOm3hchwvYsYkUYeFyNIq5jbFOddgT9EtzEJa6Qa3d GfEtCd10m5EqSVdiUw4ovY6ElMPWrwtF7T0iFVdpM1to8mLLnWC39wqmu/T1d7EBFt PJpEMzwm5+i9kf9kYGD02ddqfJXfRf8kHRgcdE6GMI+PMWuNknJQtTI4DbjDc5C/Wp UZjx6NyEVjTPw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4T9q444j2cz9rxD; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:54:44 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: [fr] org-copy-subtree or so with no header In-Reply-To: References: <87r0iqw4df.fsf@localhost> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:57:56 +0000 Message-ID: <87mstbj20r.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.20 X-Spam-Score: -7.20 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 35E1F85FB X-TUID: pARJXw4PGp/r Samuel Wales writes: > [there is more that could in principle be discussed as an /analogous/ > topic, perhaps for the picky sake of keeping orthogonality across org > features in mind, but i don't have it in me to cover. to adumbrate: > 1] allowing choosing exporting a subtree with or without the top > header similar to the above and 2] allowing /forcing/ exporting > subtrees, again with or without exporting the top header just as in > [1], even when the todo kw on the header in conjunction with > org-export-with-tasks has inhibited exporting the subtree. i have for > many years waned both feaures also. but i might not be able to > provide further clarification or particpate in the discussion for > unrelated reasons. it is just an extraneous comment for those who get > what i am talking about, if any.] If I understand correctly, 1] is covered by body-only option. 2] is probably a bug. It would help if you provide a more clear example illustrating the problem. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at