emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
To: Piotr Zielinski <piotr.zielinski@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Interpretation of priorities in org-mode
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:22:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lkcwxfw3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c12eb8d0707301053q29699a34qe0a6801bd0fbb7@mail.gmail.com> (Piotr Zielinski's message of "Mon\, 30 Jul 2007 18\:53\:37 +0100")

Hi Piotr,

"Piotr Zielinski" <piotr.zielinski@gmail.com> writes:

> I've been recently experimenting with a different interpretation of
> priorities: #B = tasks to do today, #C = tasks to do this week, #D =
> all the rest, default. #A is reserved at the moment. One good thing
> about this system is a clearer interpretation of priorities.

When i first started using priorities, i was also leaned to misuse them
as you describe, and my file ended up with top priorities everywhere.

After a while, i discover it was better:

1. not to upgrade priorities too easily;
2. not trying to make them do an other job than their job.

Let me explain myself a bit.

The #1 advice seems obvious but it is hard to stick to it. One problem
comes from Org-mode itself, because it makes it soooo easy to upgrade a
priority that you often feel like upgrading one -- instead of completing
the task under it :)

Another problem comes from the fact that priority are dependant from
each others. I think it's better to have something around 10%-[#A],
20%-[#B], and 30%-[#C], and changing the priority of a few tasks might
disturb the balance. 

So here comes the #2 advice. Because i noticed that the reflex of
upgrading too many [#B] to [#A] was just a way to make my Org files
"say" something else (yes, my Org files *speak*), like "Do it next!"
(which should be said by a TODO keyword) or "Do it today, you lazy 
bum!" (which could be said by the agenda...)

So i try to keep a reasonable number of high-prioritized tasks and if i
feel like i start to "upgrade" indecently, then i think twice about why
i'm doing this.

The thing is that i mainly use the priority system to have a useful
display of the agenda view:


(setq org-agenda-sorting-strategy
      '((agenda time-up priority-down)
	(todo priority-down)
	(tags priority-down)))


(Okay, all of this is very nice but here is the truth: i got *tons* of
chaotic tasks under misused priorities... but at least you get the way 
i would like to use them :)

PS: just thinking: another way to use priorities could be to make lower
tasks *dependant* (in they order of execution) from higher tasks. But i
would prefer to make this dependance visible by using the display order,
i.e. one task "after" another.

Regards,

-- 
Bastien

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-01  0:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-30 17:53 Interpretation of priorities in org-mode Piotr Zielinski
2007-08-01  0:22 ` Bastien [this message]
2007-08-01 14:58 ` Jason F. McBrayer
2007-08-01 15:24   ` Piotr Zielinski
2007-08-02 12:13     ` Egli Christian (KIRO 41)
2007-08-09  5:05       ` Carsten Dominik
     [not found] <E1IFuCH-0002uJ-Ki@mail.zrz.tu-berlin.de>
2007-07-31 17:38 ` Stephan Schmitt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-01 14:47 Renzo Been

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lkcwxfw3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx \
    --to=bzg@altern.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=piotr.zielinski@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).