From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xavier Maillard Subject: Re: Day workflow: need your opinion Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:11:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87ljlre5n6.wl%xma@gnu.org> References: <87y6q0dsts.wl%xma@gnu.org> Reply-To: Xavier Maillard Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MacD3-0004fP-Uj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:15:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MacCx-0004eQ-OQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:15:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44299 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MacCx-0004eH-Ki for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:15:07 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:60885 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MacCx-0006lY-1x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:15:07 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MacCs-0004uK-N7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:15:02 +0000 Received: from cha51-2-82-244-211-40.fbx.proxad.net ([82.244.211.40]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:15:02 +0000 Received: from xma by cha51-2-82-244-211-40.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:15:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:46:40 +0100, Leo wrote: > > On 2009-08-04 06:57 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > a) I doing some non urgent (planned) DBA tasks (call this project A) > > b) someone calls me (interrupting Project A) > > c) I am doing what urgency of b) is needed > > d) when c) is finished, I get back to project A > > > > At my job, they often rules the "retro planning" concept which is > > bloat. So how would you "manage" such situation in org-mode ? > > Let me give it a try. > > When I am at Task A but interupted for Task B, I will mark Task A with > one of the todo-keywords (you can create one specific for interruption > for example PAUSE). > > Then you need to review what is on your plate by C-c a t to decide your > next action after Task B. Already tried that but it failed for me. The less I do, the better for me :D Xavier