From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove superfluous lambda.
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:49:56 +0200
Message-ID: <87lj9ukn7f.fsf@gmx.de>
References: <7D715DE2-56B5-4CA5-BA2C-39987077D9E0@gmail.com>
	<1278007338-13194-2-git-send-email-dmaus@ictsoc.de>
	<897237E2-23A2-4551-80B6-B4B957FAE4FC@gmail.com>
	<87zkyactbu.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87wrtekoj0.fsf@gmx.de>
	<B2AD2F6E-5893-4AA0-AD46-4B7920708708@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54917 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUgct-0005GL-4a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:49:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>) id 1OUgcr-0000kH-Sw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:49:55 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:51694)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>) id 1OUgcr-0000k9-DB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:49:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <B2AD2F6E-5893-4AA0-AD46-4B7920708708@gmail.com> (John Wiegley's
	message of "Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:23:05 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com> writes:

> On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
>
>> I read "Accepted" which is not "Applied", is it?
>
> Accepted = Applied.


http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/73/

was never aplied.  I just diffed my branch against the current head.


  Sebastian