From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Lundin Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:34:36 -0500 Message-ID: <87lj2jouz7.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87iq197ool.fsf@mail.bantercat.co.uk> <87pqveyct2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35604 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pf0T4-0002fe-6T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:34:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pf0T2-00051i-Ku for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:34:42 -0500 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:49418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pf0T2-00051a-Br for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:34:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:41:50 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik , Jason Dunsmore Bastien writes: > Jason Dunsmore writes: > >> Option 1: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-jason/ >> Option 2: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/ >> Option 3: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric2/ > > Wow! I love this. My preference goes to Jason's version: both plain > simple and colorful. I also love Eric's expandable table of contents: > the one we have for now often clutters the page too much... Thanks so much, Jason and Eric, for taking the time to put these stylesheets together! IMO, shifting the "weight" of the page to the left, as both stylesheets do, makes the pages more and the hierarchical structure of the org source clearer. >> How should we move forward with this? Take a vote? > > Matt's call :) > > My suggestion would be to go with Jason's css (combined with Eric's > expandable table of contents) then have Eric's css and the old-worg > css available as alternative css. I like Jason's stylesheet, and have a couple of observations: 1) h3 headers are indented, but the text beneath them is not. - See http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-jason/org-tutorials/org-custom-agenda-commands.html#sec-2_1 2) h1 is a little bit off center, perhaps because of the org-mode logo? I very much like Eric's hidden table of contents. I think it makes it much easier to get right into the material and avoids some of the formatting problems associated with a float. An aside: I noticed that both stylesheets contain a lot of instructions that seem to have been created by htmlize.el: - Are these automatically generated? If so, might I ask how? - Some of the instructions seem superfluous outside of emacs (e.g., flyspell faces). Should the css be trimmed to include only items that will be displayed in html? Thanks again! Matt