From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:42:55 -0700 Message-ID: <87lj2h25qo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87lj2ij8g3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47957 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfKH8-000831-G5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:44:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfKGU-0004Nh-VH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:43:42 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:58288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfKGU-0004Nd-Qn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:43:02 -0500 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so80987vws.0 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:43:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lj2ij8g3.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:52:28 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Jason Dunsmore , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik > I don't have a strong opinion about this: splitting the FAQ into > org-faq-*.org comes to my mind, but it's a big task. org-info-js, > while not optimal for *every* page on Worg, was doing a good job > on the FAQ. I'd lean towards keep the FAQ as one large flat html file to encourage text searching in the browser, although this may be personal preference. -- Eric