From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: Re: [BABEL] Editing dot blocks with org-exp-blocks Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:02:10 -0700 Message-ID: <87lj1nn7ql.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87hbcd1t94.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87k4h9xpro.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <874o8cpt3y.fsf@gmail.com> <87tygci4rx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43087 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnZuO-0006pk-Gg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:02:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnZuN-0001ze-Bi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:02:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:52805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnZuN-0001za-6U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:02:19 -0500 Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so478900pwj.0 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:02:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87tygci4rx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:05:06 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric S Fraga Cc: Chris Maier , emacs-orgmode , Dan Davison Eric S Fraga writes: > "Eric Schulte" writes: > > [...] > >> >> I also vote for removing the dot and ditaa block types from >> org-exp-blocks, left over from before the existence of begin_src blocks. >> As the original developer of org-exp-blocks, I no longer maintain it in >> favor of focusing on begin_src blocks. >> >> The only downside to removing these block types is breaking existing >> Org-mode files... Perhaps we could add a deprecation warning which will >> appear as a message every time a begin_dot or begin_ditaa blocks is >> evaluate, then after a month or so of warning we can remove those blocks >> entirely. >> >> Thoughts? -- Eric > > Completely in favour ... > > ... so long as the message either provides a clear description of how to > change from =begin_X= to =begin-src X= or gives a link to this clear > description in the manual, say. I haven't changed the various begin_X > blocks yet because of the uncertainty in the mapping from one to the > other... and because I've been lazy, I guess ;-) Alright, I've just pushed up such deprecation warnings. They instruct the user to switch e.g., begin_dot to begin_src dot. Hopefully this is sufficient. I suppose the responsible thing to do now is to wait through an entire release cycle, and then two releases from now the functions can be removed. Cheers -- Eric