From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Subject: Re: Timer mode doesn't hyphenate correctly Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:21:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87lizuyp2p.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50961 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5gAj-00016P-AJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5gAc-0001zB-UA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:21:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:64202) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5gAc-0001z6-OA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:21:54 -0400 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so3601745wyf.0 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:21:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Mark S.'s message of "Fri, 01 Apr 2011 05:02:09 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: throaway@yahoo.com Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" "Mark S" writes: > --- On Thu, 3/31/11, Nicolas wrote: > >> It doesn't "want" anything. If you hit M-RET between left >> margin and >> beginning of item's body, the new item will be inserted >> before the >> current one. Otherwise, it will be inserted after it, as in >> any other >> type of list. >>Anyway, you can always sort your timer list with "C-c ^". >> > > Actually, its a little different. If you hit alt-enter at the end of > a line, without typing other text first, like > > - 0:00:02 :: > > It thinks that you're at the beginning of a line and places the > date-stamp *above* : > > - 0:03:43 :: > - 0:00:02 :: I didn't say at the beginning of line but before _item's body_. The tag in a description list (or a timer list) isn't considered as the body of the item, so my point is still valid. It would be the same with a checkbox. The advantage of this behavior is that M-RET will (or should) never break list structure. Imagine M-RET in the middle of a checkbox or an item tag. Regards, -- Nicolas